MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072872263 · doi:10.1094/pdis-93-8-0847b

First Report of Leaf Anthracnose Caused by <i>Phomopsis convolvuli</i> on Field Bindweed in Turkey

2009· article· en· W2072872263 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
E. Kuleci, Berna Tunalı, D. K. Berner, Christophe Cavin, Lisa A. Castlebury

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyConidiumConvolvulusPycnidiumBotanyHorticultureChlamydosporeMyceliumInoculationWeed

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.; Convolvulaceae) is a troublesome perennial weed found among many important crops in the world (1). In May of 2007, dying field bindweed plants were found along the edge of a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) field between Bafra and Taflan, Turkey (41°34.395′N, 35°52.215′E). Lesions on leaves were irregular and variable in size and dark black with green margins. Severely diseased leaves were wilted or dead. Fruiting bodies were not evident on field-collected material. Diseased tissue was surface disinfested and placed on moist filter paper in petri plates. Numerous pycnidia with alpha conidia were observed after 2 weeks. A fungus, designated 24-6, was isolated from the diseased leaves. Cultures on potato dextrose agar (PDA) were floccose with white mycelia and small black stromata. Alpha conidia from pycnidia on inoculated plants were biguttulate, one celled, hyaline, oblong to ellipsoid, and 7.0 to 12.8 × 3.0 to 5.5 μm (mean 10.0 × 3.9 μm). Neither beta conidia nor the teleomorph, Diaporthe sp., were observed on diseased tissue or in cultures. Morphology was consistent with that of Phomopsis convolvuli Ormeno-Nunez, Reeleder & A.K. Watson (2). Alpha conidia were harvested from 12-day-old cultures grown on PDA by brushing the surface of the colonies with a small paint brush, suspending the conidia in sterile distilled water, and filtering through cheesecloth. The conidia were then resuspended in sterile distilled water plus 0.1% polysorbate 20 to arrive at a concentration of 107 conidia/ml. Stems and leaves of seven plants at the 3- to 5-leaf stage were spray inoculated with 10 ml per plant of this aqueous suspension. Inoculated plants and two noninoculated plants were placed in a dew chamber at 24°C in darkness and continuous dew. After 48 h, plants from the dew chamber were moved to a greenhouse bench. Disease severity was evaluated 1 week after inoculation with a rating system based on a scale from 0 to 4, in which 0 = no symptoms, 1 = 1 to 25% necrosis, 2 = 26 to 50% necrosis, 3 = 51 to 75% necrosis, and 4 = 76 to 100% necrosis (2). The average disease rating on inoculated plants was 3.75. No disease was observed on noninoculated plants. P. convolvuli was reisolated from all inoculated plants. Comparison of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 and 2 sequences with available sequences of a vouchered P. convolvuli specimen (GenBank Nos. U11363, U11417; BPI 748009, FAU649) showed 192 of 193 and 176 of 179 identities, respectively, for the two regions. Nucleotide sequences for the ribosomal ITS regions (ITS 1 and 2, including 5.8S rDNA) were deposited in GenBank (Accession No. FJ710810), and a voucher specimen has been deposited with the U.S. National Fungus Collections (BPI 878927). To our knowledge, this is the second report in the world of leaf anthracnose on field bindweed caused by P. convolvuli. The first report was from Canada (3) of an isolate that was later patented for biological control of C. arvensis (4). References: (1) L. Holm et al. The World's Worst Weeds. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, 1977. (2) J. Ormeno-Nunez, et al. Can. J. Bot. 66:2228, 1988. (3) J. Ormeno-Nunez et al. Plant Dis. 72:338, 1988. (4) A. K. Watson et al. U.S. Patent 5,212,086, 1993.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207