MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072930743 · doi:10.1002/apj.5500110406

The Prediction of Viscosity for Mixtures Using a Modified Square Well Intermolecular Potential Model

2003· article· en· W2072930743 on OpenAlex
J.D. Williams, William Y. Svrcek, Wayne D. Monnery

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopments in Chemical Engineering and Mineral Processing · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsPetro-CanadaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermodynamicsViscosityIntermolecular forcePolarWork (physics)Binary numberMixing (physics)Square (algebra)Absolute deviationMass transferChemistryMaterials scienceMathematicsOrganic chemistryMoleculePhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the chemical and process industries, the viscosity of pure components and mixtures is a required fluid property in the areas of hydraulics, heat transfer, and mass transfer. Hence, there is a definite need for a reliable and accurate method for viscosity calculations of mixtures that is applicable over the entire density range for a wide variety of components. The Modified Square Well Intermolecular Potential viscosity model developed by Monnery et al. (1998) to predict pure component viscosities offers a good compromise between theory and applicability. In this work, the square well model is extended to mixtures. A total of 276 binary mixtures, including non‐polar and polar components, were used to regress binary interaction parameters for the mixing rules. The predicted mixture viscosities had a 10% average absolute deviation for the entire density range that included the gas, liquid, and dense phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it