Synthesis, characterization, and biological properties of small branched RNA fragments containing chiral (R<sub>p</sub>and S<sub>p</sub>) 2′,5′-phosphorothioate linkages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synthetic branched RNA fragments were prepared to examine the stereochemical requirements for hydrolysis of RNA lariats by the yeast debranching enzyme (yDBR). Specifically, two branched trinucleoside diphosphates and a tetranucleoside triphosphate containing a 2',5'-linked phosphorothioate linkage of defined stereochemistry, namely Rp-A(2'ps5'G)pC, Sp-A(2'ps5'G)pC and Sp-ApA(2'ps5'G)pC, were prepared via solution-phase methods. Unlike the all-phosphodiester control, A(2'p5'G)pC, the Rp-thioated trimer was not cleaved by yDBR, demonstrating that changing the pro-Rp oxygen at the 2',5' phosphodiester bond averts hydrolysis by the enzyme. In contrast, the Sp branched compounds (trimer and tetramer) were cleaved yDBR, albeit with reduced efficiency relative to the corresponding all-phosphodiester branched compounds. Furthermore, the small branched RNAs (5 nt) were not cleaved as efficiently as a 18-nt bRNA, suggesting that the enzyme appears to have a stronger preference for larger bRNA substrates. The non-hydrolyzable branched RNA fragments prepared during these studies may be promising candidates for the future co-crystallization and X-ray analyses of DBR:bRNA complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".