Expression and localization of P‐, K‐, and OB‐cadherin in the prepubertal rat ovary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Classical and atypical cadherins mediate calcium-dependent cell adhesion and play an important role in morphogenetic processes. We have shown, previously, N- and E-cadherin expression in the rat ovary. This expression, however, was not associated with specific follicle-restructuring events such as antrum formation and segregation of mural from cumulus granulosa cells suggesting that other cadherins may serve this function. In this study, RT-PCR and immunostaining techniques showed that three other cadherins are expressed throughout prepubertal ovarian development in the rat: one classical (P-) cadherin, and two atypical (K- and OB-) cadherins. RT-PCR analysis of isolated ovarian tissue compartments (granulosa cells and the residual ovarian tissue) agreed with the immunostaining results. Immunostaining showed P- and K-cadherin expression by granulosa, as well as thecal/interstitial cells, and also in oocytes of primordial follicles. P-cadherin expression was absent in oocytes of follicles in later stages of development compared to K-cadherin, which was found in oocytes at all stages of folliculogenesis. P-, K-, and OB-cadherin were expressed by the ovarian surface epithelial cells of neonatal animals but only P- and OB-cadherin expression were maintained in these cells in 25 day-old animals. Cellular OB-cadherin staining was absent in follicles at all stages of development and its expression was restricted to the ovarian hilar region and portions of the stroma. In summary, cadherin expression and distribution profiles changed during ovarian growth and folliculogenesis suggesting a role for cadherins in organizational and morphogenetic processes within the developing rat ovary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".