MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072966139 · doi:10.1163/1568539x-00003211

Seasonal plasticity of maternal behaviour in Peromyscus maniculatus

2014· article· en· W2072966139 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBehaviour · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeromyscusLickingOffspringBiologyDeer mouseZoologyPaternal careRodentPhysiologyEcologyPregnancyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Individual variation in maternal care has been shown to have important consequences for offspring behaviour, development, and physiology. The proximate mechanisms associated with these maternal effects have been elegantly detailed in laboratory rodents where environmental variation is typically minimized. However, investigating the ultimate consequences of differences in maternal behaviour and factors that maintain variation in maternal care requires the extension of well established protocols for measuring maternal behaviour in the lab to a wild rodent species. In the present study we build on the important contributions of laboratory research by applying laboratory protocols for quantifying maternal behaviour, maternal provisioning, and maternal responsivity in laboratory rodents to wild-caught Peromyscus , which experience large fluctuations in environmental conditions. We temporarily transported wild-caught deer mice ( Peromyscus maniculatus gracilis ) to a field laboratory for parturition and the first week post partum and then returned individuals with their offspring to the wild. We demonstrate that the proportion of time spent nursing by wild-caught deer mice was similar to previous studies of laboratory rodents and was repeatable within litters. However, in contrast to prior studies of laboratory rodents, the proportion of time spent nursing by wild-caught deer mice was independent of the proportion of time spent licking and grooming and the latency to retrieve pups in a pup-retrieval test. Wild-caught deer mice also exhibited a high degree of seasonal plasticity in nursing behaviour; females that raised litters early in the season spent almost twice as much time nursing as those raising litters at the end of the season. The amount of time spent nursing offspring in captivity was negatively correlated with population density of wild mice in the field at the time of their capture, but such a seasonal decline in nursing could also be caused by other seasonal changes in their natural environment. These findings suggest the potential for much greater plasticity in maternal care by rodents than might otherwise be revealed from studies of animals born and raised under controlled laboratory conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it