Black-fruited hawthorns of western North America — one or more agamic complexes?This paper is one of a selection of papers published in the Special Issue on Systematics Research.This paper is dedicated to the memory of the University of Idaho botanist who got us thinking about the complexities of Northwest hawthorns: the late Steven J. Brunsfeld.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Black-fruited hawthorns in North America comprise two taxonomic groups within the genus Crataegus , section Brevispinae and section Douglasianae. The first of these has recently been shown to be monospecific, consisting of the blueberry haw, Crataegus brachyacantha Sarg. & Engelm., of Louisiana and Texas. Crataegus section Douglasianae, however, comprises several taxa in a single clade that is not closely related to section Brevispinae, and that is now one of the best-studied groups of hawthorns at least in North America. Most taxa in the group are found in, or west of, the Rocky Mountains. They include diploids, triploids, and tetraploids that can be ascribed to four or more species that differ in distribution and ecology, thorn morphology, leaf shape, and floral architecture. Diploids are self-incompatible, whereas polyploidy is associated with pseudogamous, gametophytic apomixis and self compatibility. Molecular data suggest that polyploids have arisen repeatedly, both within and from crosses between ploidy levels. We suggest that Crataegus section Douglasianae represents at least two agamic complexes that may serve as models for understanding the biology of, the relationships within, and the appropriate taxonomic treatment of other such groups that may make up much of the rest of the genus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".