MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073006040 · doi:10.2113/gscpgbull.56.1.62

Stratigraphic relationships of the Triassic Halfway Formation in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin

2008· article· en· W2073006040 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
J Dixon

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCitationGeological surveyStructural basinSedimentary rockConfusionPaleontologyLibrary scienceSedimentary basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| March 01, 2008 Stratigraphic relationships of the Triassic Halfway Formation in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin James Dixon James Dixon Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2L 2A7 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information James Dixon Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2L 2A7 Publisher: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Received: 17 Apr 2007 Accepted: 29 Oct 2007 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 2368-0261 Print ISSN: 0007-4802 © The Society of Canadian Petroleum Geologists Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2008) 56 (1): 62–68. https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.56.1.62 Article history Received: 17 Apr 2007 Accepted: 29 Oct 2007 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation James Dixon; Stratigraphic relationships of the Triassic Halfway Formation in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2008;; 56 (1): 62–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.56.1.62 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Although the lithostratigraphic definition of the Middle Triassic Halfway Formation at the type section is quite precise and should be a clear guide to identifying the formation, there has been some confusion in its usage in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB). Some of the problems were identified by Dixon (2005) and schematically illustrated in his figure 6 but his work focused more on the identification of an unconformity rather than on nomenclatural problems. A lithostratigaphic unit is a mappable, usually contiguous, lithological body, which may or may not have chronological significance. The Halfway Formation fits this definition, for the... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologySame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207