Bibliographic record
Abstract
COMME TOUTE HISTOIRE, CELLE DU CANADA EST COMPOSITE, frag mentee. Celle de sa culture est une suite de conflits, de refus mais aussi de metissages et d'echanges. On ne cesse de recommencer a redecouvrir les cultures autochtones, a tenter de les reconstituer. Certaines ne sont malheureusement que des inscriptions, souvent affadies, a peine lisibles, d'une histoire sans suite. Les traces et les vestiges d'autres sont recueillis tout autant par ceux dont elles constituent le patrimoine que par ceux qui sen sont nourris comme spec tateurs transformes en temoins. Certes, l'heritage appartient a ceux qui en sont issus mais egalement a ceux qui, venus dailleurs, tentent de preserver des lectures d'un reel dissipe et oblitere par le temps. Le Canada a connu ensuite les deux cultures de conquete, celle de la France et celle de la Grande-Bretagne. Nouveaux venus sur cette terre, ces pays se sont battus pour l'investir et ont decouvert, de generation en gene ration, que les cultures ont souvent la capacite de survivre aux conquetes voire a la maitrise du territoire oil elles sont etablies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.065 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".