MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073066587 · doi:10.1002/dvdy.21800

Roscovitine inhibits thyroid hormone‐induced tail regression of the frog tadpole and reveals a role for cyclin C/Cdk8 in the establishment of the metamorphic gene expression program

2008· article· en· W2073066587 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel C. Skirrow, Nik Veldhoen, Dominik Domański, Caren C. Helbing

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Dynamics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMetamorphosisTadpole (physics)Cyclin-dependent kinaseCyclinXenopusCell biologyThyroid hormone receptorInternal medicineGenePhosphorylationGene expressionEndocrinologyHormoneCell cycleGeneticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The involvement of phosphorylation signaling pathways in postembryonic development of the frog is poorly understood. The thyroid hormone, 3, 5, 3'-triiodothyronine (T(3)), is essential for inducing tadpole metamorphosis and we show that the cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitor, roscovitine, prevents T(3)-dependent regression of cultured tail tips from Rana catesbeiana tadpoles. Using tail tips from precociously induced and naturally metamorphosing tadpoles, our data suggest that protein phosphorylation is important in the establishment of the T(3)-dependent proapoptotic gene expression program. Our evidence indicates that Cdk8 is the most likely candidate for this proapoptotic activity with the expression of its regulatory subunit, cyclin C, identified as a novel T(3)-responsive gene. We suggest that this activity is crucial for the genetic reprogramming required for tail regression and demonstrate that protein phosphorylation is important in T(3)-induced apoptosis in normal cells during development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental DynamicsSame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207