MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073093703 · doi:10.1139/x09-133

Behaviour of<i>Neonectria fuckeliana</i>causing a pine canker disease in New Zealand

2009· article· en· W2073093703 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Patricia E. Crane, A. Hopkins, M. A. Dick, L. S. Bulman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersForest Biosecurity Research Council
KeywordsBiologyAscosporeCankerSporeBotanyGerminationBiological dispersalMildewHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neonectria fuckeliana (C. Booth) Castl. & Rossman is known to be associated with a stem canker disease of Pinus radiata D. Don in New Zealand plantation forests. Although N. fuckeliana has been previously recorded as a wound invader or weak pathogen of Picea and Abies species in the Northern Hemisphere, little is currently known about the basic biology of the fungus. This paper outlines early investigations into the spore production and dispersal of N. fuckeliana in New Zealand. Perithecia of N. fuckeliana occur frequently on pruned stubs and on the surface of cankers, and ascospores appear to be the primary means of dispersal for this fungus in New Zealand. Both field collections and spore trapping show that mature perithecia contain viable ascospores in all seasons, and spores are ejected and dispersed using moisture. The conidial phases are rarely found in the field. Optimum temperature for both growth of mycelium and ascospore germination was between 15 and 25 °C. Some spore germination occurred at temperatures as low as 5 °C, but above 25 °C spore germination was abnormal. Ascospores and perithecia favoured storage in lower temperatures: overall, ascospores from perithecia stored at room temperature gradually lost their viability, whereas those stored at 4 and –8 °C maintained their viability over an 18 month period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207