MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073099839 · doi:10.1039/c1an15060j

Infrared spectromicroscopy of biochemistry in functional single cells

2011· review· en· W2073099839 on OpenAlexafffund
Luca Quaroni, Theodora Zlateva

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Cancer Agency
FundersWestern Economic Diversification CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of SaskatchewanCanadian Light Source
KeywordsFourier transform infrared spectroscopyBiomoleculeCharacterization (materials science)InfraredSynchrotronFourier transformChemistryInfrared spectroscopyNanotechnologyReactivity (psychology)Materials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)SpectroscopyMacromoleculeBiophysicsChemical engineeringOpticsChromatographyBiochemistryBiologyOrganic chemistryPhysicsMedicinePathologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the years Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has been widely employed in the structural and functional characterization of biomolecules. The introduction of infrared (IR) microscopes and of synchrotron light sources has created expectations that FTIR could become a generally viable technique to study both structure and reactivity in vivo, inside single cells, by performing measurements that up to a few years ago were the preserve of in vitro experiments on purified macromolecules. In this review we present the state-of-the-art in the application of FTIR spectromicroscopy as a technique for the study of structure and dynamics in single cells, we discuss the performance requirements for this application and review developments in sample handling methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AnalystSame topicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207