Clinical and experimental evidence of sympathetic neural dysfunction during inflammatory bowel disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) alter the function of the enteric nervous system and the sensory innervation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Less is known about whether IBD also affects the sympathetic nervous system (SNS). Given the importance of the SNS in regulating GI function and possibly immune system activation, the present review examines the evidence of sympathetic dysfunction during IBD and its possible consequences. 2. Sympathetic axons within the GI tract innervate several cell types, including vascular myocytes, enteric neurons and immune cells. The major neurotransmitters released from sympathetic varicosities are noradrenaline, neuropeptide Y and ATP or a related purine. 3. Clinical studies of IBD patients have provided evidence of an association between IBD and axonal or demyelinating neuropathy. Assays of autonomic function suggest that ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, the two major forms of IBD, have contrasting effects on sympathetic neural activity. 4. Animal models of IBD have been used to examine the effects of these diseases on sympathetic neurophysiology. A decrease in the release of noradrenaline from sympathetic varicosities in inflamed and uninflamed regions of the GI tract has consistently been reported. Recent findings suggest that the decrease in neurotransmitter release may be due to inhibition of N-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) current in post-ganglionic sympathetic neurons. 5. Interest in the role of the SNS in IBD is rapidly increasing. However, much work needs to be done to enhance understanding of how SNS function is altered during IBD and what contribution, if any, these changes make to pathogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".