MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2073232620 · doi:10.1118/1.1997705

SU‐FF‐T‐34: Inversely Planned Catheter Positions for High Dose Rate Brachytherapy of the Prostate

2005· article· en· W2073232620 on OpenAlexaffabout
Étienne Lessard, Luc Beaulieu, I‐Chow Hsu, Jean Pouliot

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrethraBrachytherapyProstate brachytherapyProstateCatheterMedicineDosimetryProstatic urethraNuclear medicineRadiation treatment planningInflatableUrologyProstate cancerBiomedical engineeringRadiation therapyRadiologyCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To determine the dosimetric impact of the number of catheters used in prostate HDR brachytherapy and to evaluate the possibility of reducing the number currently used clinically. Method and Materials: Our in‐house inverse planning optimizes the catheter positions based on clinical objectives such as prostate dose coverage, dose homogeneity and urethra protection. This optimization displaces straight catheters on a 5 mm grid searching for the best pattern. The number of catheters is fixed, only their positions and the dwell times are optimized. For one prostate, 8 implants were generated with different number of catheters (5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18). Results: Implants with more than 10 catheters shows equivalent dosimetric indices with good dose coverage (V100>95%) and low dose delivered to the urethra (V120<5%). With less than 10 catheters the implant dosimetry deteriorates rapidly. The protection of the urethra from high dose (V150=0) is independent of the number of catheters. This demonstrates that decent dose coverage can be achieved with a reduced number of catheters without affecting the urethra protection. The optimization tends to produce implants with peripherally loaded catheters and manages to produce adequate dose coverage with just a few catheters in the middle part of the prostate close to the urethra. Conclusion: This study encourages the diminution of the number of catheters implanted around the urethra, improving the urethra protection and facilitating the implant procedure. This is only true when using an inverse planning to optimize the dwell times. Centers that are performing the treatment planning without an inverse planning need these central catheters to produce adequate dose coverage. This demonstrates that inverse planning brings the possibility to safely reduce the number of catheters currently used in prostate HDR brachytherapy. This research was supported by NCI Canada with funds from the CCS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→