Effect of Intravenous Immunoglobulin on Prednisone Dose in Patients with Pemphigus Vulgaris
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current therapeutic options for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) are prednisone and immunosuppressants. Patients unresponsive to high-dose systemic corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressants may respond to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). OBJECTIVE: The primary outcome was the change in prednisone dose at 6 months and 1 year post-IVIG administration. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of PV patients treated at Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre between January 1999 and October 2004 was conducted. Demographic information, corticosteroid and IVIG use, dosage, and the timing of administration for all patients were obtained. RESULTS: Eight PV patients, mean age of 50 years (+/- 14.7 years), were reviewed. There was a significant decrease in mean prednisone dose at 6 months (45%) and 12 months (71%) compared with the mean dose at the start of treatment (p < .05). LIMITATIONS: Concomitant medication use may influence results. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that IVIG can lower prednisone doses in PV patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".