MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073278061 · doi:10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.06.013

Active trachoma in children in central Ethiopia: association with altitude

2005· article· en· W2073278061 on OpenAlexaff
Wondu Alemayehu, Muluken Melese, Eva Fredlander, Alemayehu Worku, Paul Courtright

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsCentre for Advancing Health Outcomes
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrachomaLatrineAltitude (triangle)MedicineDemographyPopulationCross-sectional studyEnvironmental healthBlindnessCluster samplingGeographyOptometrySanitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the dry month of February 2000 in the Gurage Zone of Ethiopia (population over 1.5 million) to determine the magnitude of trachoma and blindness. A multistage cluster sampling was applied to identify the study subjects. Pre-school children (1-6 years) were examined for active trachoma by trained ophthalmic nurses. The prevalence of active trachoma in the 1-6-year-old age group was 56.5%, ranging from 5.7% (altitude > 3000 m) to 73.4% (altitude less than 2000 m) (P < 0.001). Active trachoma was more common in male children than in female children and peaked in the 3-year-old age group (63.2%), declining with age. The distance to a source of water for 45% of these households was only 15 min. Only 6% of the households had latrines. Confirmation of the association between active disease and altitude may assist with mapping of trachoma in Ethiopia and elsewhere. It is possible that fly density, higher in villages at low altitudes, contributed to the differences seen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and HygieneSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207