MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073315080 · doi:10.1088/0026-1394/40/1/311

A bilateral comparison of spectral responsivity measurements in the spectral range 250 nm to 1800 nm between the NIST (USA) and the NRC (Canada)

2003· article· en· W2073315080 on OpenAlexaffabout
Louis‐Philippe Boivin, Sally S. Bruce

Bibliographic record

VenueMetrologia · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNISTGermaniumMaterials scienceInternational Temperature Scale of 1990OpticsSemiconductor detectorDetectorSiliconCalibrationOptoelectronicsPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This intercomparison of spectral responsivity between the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in the United States and the National Research Council (NRC) of Canada was carried out to test the level of agreement between the two laboratories for routine detector calibrations and also to support the uncertainties quoted by NIST and NRC in appendix C of the Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) drawn up by the International Committee of Weights and Measures (CIPM). The comparison was carried out in two stages: 250 nm to 1100 nm using three silicon (Si) photodiodes, then 700 nm to 1800 nm using two germanium (Ge) and two indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) detectors. This paper describes briefly the derivation of the spectral responsivity scales, measurement procedures and apparatus used for each laboratory. The results of the intercomparison are presented. In the spectral ranges from 250 nm to 1000 nm for silicon and 750 nm to 1700 nm for germanium and InGaAs, the agreement between the two laboratories is well within the combined uncertainties. In particular, in the 450 nm to 1000 nm spectral range, the agreement is better than ±0.2%. In the 900 nm to 1600 nm spectral range, the agreement is typically ±0.5%. Consequently, the results of this intercomparison are shown to support the uncertainties claimed by NIST and NRC in their routine calibrations, and in their appendix C entries of the MRA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetrologiaSame topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207