MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073349849 · doi:10.1039/c1fo10201j

Digestibility and β-carotene release from lipid nanodispersions depend on dispersed phase crystallinity and interfacial properties

2011· article· en· W2073349849 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Malaki Nik, Sarah Langmaid, Amanda J. Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueFood & Function · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProteins in Food Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipid digestionPulmonary surfactantChemistryPoloxamerChromatographyColloidAqueous two-phase systemCrystallinityEmulsionChemical engineeringPhase (matter)Aqueous solutionSolid lipid nanoparticleOrganic chemistryBiochemistryLipasePolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The influence of interfacial structure and lipid physical state on colloidal stability and digestibility of solid lipid nanoparticle dispersions (SLN) and canola oil-in-water emulsions (COE) stabilized with the non-ionic surfactants Poloxamer 188 (P188) and Tween 20 (T20) were examined and the release of encapsulated β-carotene (BC) under simulated gastrointestinal conditions determined. While the SLN and COE were all stable during exposure to gastric conditions (mean diameter ∼115 nm), more destabilization was observed for the COE than SLN during the duodenal phase. ζ-Potential measurements indicated rapid adsorption of bile salts (BS) and phospholipids (PL) to both solid and liquid interfaces, with greater surfactant displacement observed for the COE. Compared to the SLN, significantly more lipolysis and BC transfer to the aqueous phase was observed for both the COE-P188 and COE-T20 (p < 0.05). The properties of the colloidal structures present in the aqueous phase, which are important in terms of the uptake of lipolytic products and lipophilic bioactives, depended on non-ionic surfactant type, the extent of lipid digestion, as well as the presence of BS and PL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood & FunctionSame topicProteins in Food SystemsFrench-language works237,207