Vector quantisation for finite‐state Markov channels and application to wireless communications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Vector quantisation for joint source‐channel (JSC) coding over a finite‐state Markov channel (FSMC) is studied. In particular, minimum mean square error (MMSE) decoding of a vector quantised source in the absence of channel state information (CSI) is considered. Based on hidden Markov modelling of the channel output, two decoding strategies are proposed. The first one is a soft‐decoder which estimates the source reconstruction vectors directly from a sequence of channel output samples. The second one is a hard‐decoder based on joint maximum a posteriori (MAP) probability estimation of channel symbols and channel states. An iterative procedure for designing JSC optimised vector quantisers (VQs) is also proposed. Finally, the design of VQs for wireless channels using a finite‐state model is examined. Experimental results are provided for a Gauss‐Markov source and flat‐fading wireless channels. A comparison with an idealised tandem source‐channel coding system is also provided to demonstrate the advantage of the proposed JSC coding approach. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".