MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073350950 · doi:10.2118/145158-pa

Experimental Study of Controlled Gravity Drainage in Fractured Porous Media

2011· article· en· W2073350950 on OpenAlexaff
Sohrab Zendehboudi, Ioannis Chatzis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorous mediumDimensionless quantityVolumetric flow rateMatrix (chemical analysis)Production ratePermeability (electromagnetism)Petroleum engineeringMechanicsFracture (geology)Materials sciencePorosityChemistryComposite materialGeologyPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Oil production from a fractured reservoir with a gas cap and an oil zone usually takes place at a constant withdrawal rate until gas breakthrough; thereafter, the pumping rate is influenced by the presence of gas. Knowing the effect of pumping rate on production performance before gas breakthrough and selecting optimum pumping rates are necessary. In this paper, the concept of "critical production rate" (CPR) is introduced; it is the production rate at which a porous medium has a recovery factor (RF) equal to that for higher rates before gas enters into the production well, and is also the rate above which the difference between liquid levels in the fracture and matrix remains unchanged. One may use the CPR to choose a lower pumping rate to increase RF before gas breakthrough and to aid in understanding the physics of pumping from fractured media in real cases. Flow visualization experiments were performed using rectangular unconsolidated-packed models with two fractures on the sides. Sensitivity analyses were performed on the effect of different system parameters on the CPR, the maximum possible withdrawal rate (MPWR), RF at gas breakthrough, and gas-liquid (G-L) interface behaviour in both matrix and fractures. Results show that as long as the porous medium is drained with a constant liquid withdrawal rate below CPR, the height difference between G-L interfaces in the matrix and fracture remains constant. CPR and RF can also be related to other system parameters using dimensionless numbers, such as fracture/matrix permeability ratio and Bond number.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207