Phytoplankton-aloricate ciliate community in the Bahía Blanca Estuary (Argentina): seasonal patterns and trophic groups
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The seasonal pattern of the phytoplankton-aloricate ciliate community is an adequate indicator of trophic coupling and nutrient cycling in coastal environments. The size-fractionated, abundance, biomass and composition of a phytoplankton-aloricate ciliate community were ascertained in the Bahía Blanca Estuary from February 1994 to February 1995. In addition, ciliate production and excretion rates by size class were estimated. A winter-early spring diatom bloom was the most important event in the annual cycle. To evaluate the significance of phytoplankton size in the food web, <25 µm and > 25 µm fractions of chlorophyll a were determined; the < 25 µm fraction was dominant. To classify the ciliate community in trophic groups, it was divided into volume-size classes, from <10³ µm³to > 10(5) µm³; this wide range of size indicated the potential prey. The smaller ciliates dominated abundance but the larger ones dominated biomass. Values of total ciliates, ranging from 0.2 to 5.2 x 10³ cells L-1 and 0.55 to 83.9 µg C L-1, and levels of total chlorophyll a reached 40.4 µg L-1 and were higher than those recorded for other temperate estuarine systems. The smaller ciliates were potentially important as nitrogen regenerators in summer and spring, when their estimated production was highest. The annual potential production of 3 mg C L-1 represents a reference parameter from which possible changes in the trophic status of this environment could be predicted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".