MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2073381117 · doi:10.1016/s1873-9598(09)70047-x

International Referral and Elderly Care—A Case of Atypical Parkinsonism and Cerebellar Atrophy

2009· article· en· W2073381117 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ying‐Hua Shieh, Kuong-Hang Fong, Shiou-Dar Su

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of gerontology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParkinsonismReferralAtrophyPediatricsFamily medicinePathologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 66-year-old male patient had a history of hepatitis B, was a hepatitis C carrier, and had hypertension. He was referred to our family medicine international clinic by the Canadian Physician's Referral Service. He had had progressive general weakness over 2 years, and the symptom had recently exacerbated. He also had slurred speech, difficulty in swallowing with occasional choking, constipation, and urinary incontinence. He was diagnosed as having Parkinson disease, but his symptoms worsened despite treatment with levodopa 250mg four times daily for 2 years. He had sought medical help in many clinics in Taiwan and Canada and was referred to our outpatient clinic by his Canadian family physician. The neurologist suggested that the diagnosis was multiple system atrophy (MSA) after history taking and neurologic examination. Rehabilitation programs, including physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy, were arranged for him. Many Taiwanese immigrants prefer to come back to Taiwan for medical treatment. If we can integrate medical resources not only between different hospitals but also between different countries, many unnecessary medical expenses could be avoided. In this case, we summarized the case history and provided him with a CD of the images. This will be helpful in further care by a Canadian physician.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational journal of gerontology→Same topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→