MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073414768 · doi:10.1139/cjz-2014-0147

Stress tolerance in a polyextremophile: the southernmost insect

2014· article· en· W2073414768 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R.E. Lee, David L. Denlinger

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiologyDesiccationEcologyMidgeAbiotic componentLarvaOsmotic shockDesiccation toleranceZoologyBotanyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since biotic interactions within the simple terrestrial communities on the Antarctic Peninsula are limited compared with tropical and temperate regions, survival is largely dictated by the numerous abiotic challenges. Our research focuses on adaptations to environmental stresses experienced by the Antarctic midge (Belgica antarctica Jacobs, 1900), the southernmost free-living insect. Midge larvae can survive freezing and anoxia year-round. Not only can frozen larvae undergo rapid cold-hardening (RCH) at temperatures as low as –12 °C, but RCH develops more rapidly in frozen compared with supercooled larvae. Whether larvae overwinter in a frozen state or cryoprotectively dehydrated may depend on hydration levels within their hibernacula. Larvae constitutively up-regulate genes encoding heat shock proteins, as well as the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase and catalase. Larvae accumulate osmoprotectants in response to freezing, desiccation, and exposure to seawater; exposure to one of these osmotic stressors confers cross-tolerance to the others. Molecular responses to dehydration stress include extensive genome-wide changes that include differential expression of aquaporins among tissues, upregulation of pathways associated with autophagy, inhibition of apoptosis, and downregulation of metabolism and ATP production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207