MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073421227 · doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.96.3.453

New Evidence for Multiple Periods of Gold Emplacement in the PorcupineMining District, Timmins Area, Ontario, Canada

2001· article· en· W2073421227 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthew D. Gray, Richard W. Hutchinson

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryClastic rockQuartzBrecciaGreenschistPyriteSericiteMetamorphic rockIron oxide copper gold ore depositsCarbonateFluid inclusionsSedimentary rockPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Porcupine mining district is the largest lode gold-producing district in North America, with production in excess of 62,000,000 troy oz. Nearly all of the Au has come from quartz-carbonate lode systems hosted by metamorphic rocks of greenschist facies. Field relationships and radioisotope ages of intrusions indicate that gold emplacement occurred over a span of at least 7 m.y. Depositional events that predated formation of the Timiskaming unconformity surface are manifested by auriferous clasts of detrital pyrite, banded quartz sulfide, and quartz sulfide in basal Timiskaming conglomerate. Pyritic clasts contain on average 2.54 ppm Au and are conclusive evidence for the existence of pre-Timiskaming-aged auriferous pyritic deposits. These clasts may have been derived from pyritic bodies in carbonaceous argillites of the Tisdale Group, from sulfide facies iron-formation of the Deloro Group, or from pyritic deposits of unknown genesis. Auriferous banded sulfidic quartz clasts were probably derived from iron-formation of the Deloro Group and auriferous sulfidic quartz clasts possibly from epigenetic quartz sulfide veins. Intrusion-related and post-Timiskaming gold deposition is evidenced by Cu-Au-(Mo) mineralized porphyry and younger quartz-carbonate gold veins. The magmatism that emplaced feldspar and quartz-feldspar porphyries was accompanied by Cu-Au-(Mo) mineralization at the Dome mine, where a conformable quartz-feldspar porphyry intrusion and its host greenstones are pervasively and atypically copper and gold mineralized, and the porphyry is anomalously molybdenum enriched. A new U-Pb zircon date on this mineralized porphyry fixes its emplacement and the maximum age of Cu-Au-(Mo) deposition at 2688 ± 2 Ma. This mineralization was overprinted by later gold mineralization in the form of planar, sheeted, and en echelon auriferous quartz veins and by mineralized shear and/or fault zones. Field relationships indicate that these veins significantly postdate emplacement of the porphyries and Timiskaming sedimentation. The latest vein systems form the bulk of the ore at the Dome mine and are similar to the most economically significant veins of the district. The largest gold deposits of the district are spatially associated with, but not in, porphyries similar to those exposed at the Dome mine. This association has led to considerable speculation regarding the genetic relationship of felsic porphyry emplacement to ore formation. The results of this study show that although some Au was deposited during a Cu-Au-Mo event temporally linked to porphyry emplacement, most of the Au at the Dome mine was emplaced significantly later than the porphyries. The documentation of at least three broad periods of Au emplacement, at least two of which are premetamorphic, is permissive and supportive of genetic hypotheses that invoke metamorphogenic remobilization of Au from earlier formed deposits. Alternatively, the coincidence of early gold enrichments and later economic concentrations may reflect a single, unidentified gold source from which successive but unrelated hydrothermal activity mobilized, transported, and deposited Au, with no direct genetic link between early and late episodes of gold deposition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207