Early Postoperative Complications of Deep Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report and discuss the early postoperative complications of deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK). METHODS: The records of the first 44 patients who underwent DLEK by 1 surgeon were reviewed. Complications occurring between the first day and eighth week after surgery were recorded. RESULTS: In 6 patients (13.6%), the donor disc was floating in the anterior chamber on the first postoperative day and was repositioned with a 30-gauge needle. Fluid was present between the cornea and the disc in 8 patients (18.2%); in 6 of them, the fluid absorbed spontaneously. In 2 patients, the fluid was aspirated 1 month after surgery, but fibrosis developed in the interface. Two patients (4.5%) had persistent corneal edema. In 1 of them, the edema resolved after 2 months, but the other needed penetrating keratoplasty. One patient (2.3%) developed endothelial graft rejection when steroid treatment was discontinued because of exacerbation of preexisting glaucoma. Ten patients (22.7%) had elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) before surgery. The pressure was controlled with topical medication after surgery in 7 patients, 1 patient (mentioned above) suffered graft rejection, 1 patient underwent repeat trabeculectomy, and 1 patient needed insertion of a glaucoma valve. Three patients (6.8%) who did not have glaucoma before surgery developed elevated IOP postoperatively, which was controlled with topical medication. CONCLUSION: Non-adhesion of the disc and elevated IOP were the most common complications after DLEK. The mechanical preparation of a thinner donor disc and more experience may lead to fewer postoperative complications and their more efficient management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".