Inadequate adherence to antiretroviral treatment and prevention in hospital and community sites in Burkina Faso and Mali: a study by the ATARAO group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our objective was to determine the prevalence and identify the factors that influence antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence among patients in Bamako and Ouagadougou. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 94 men and 176 women receiving ART. Data were collected through questionnaires and chart reviews. Logistic regressions were performed to isolate determinants of adherence. Overall, 58% of the patients were adherent, but there were differences in the levels of adherence according to country and treatment site. Sociodemographic factors were not associated with adherence. However, social characteristics such as having children, in Ouagadougou, or being a housewife and not planning to have a child in the next year, in Bamako were associated with adherence. Time on ART was negatively associated with adherence in both countries with decline occurring later in Bamako. Levels of adherence are inadequate particularly among more experienced patients. Further adherence research and monitoring using longitudinal designs are warranted to assess the extent to which adherence is declining with time on treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".