DDAVP challenge tests in boys with mild/moderate haemophilia A*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desmopressin (DDAVP) increases plasma factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) levels in patients with mild/moderate haemophilia A. In some subjects, FVIII can be increased to haemostatic levels, thereby avoiding use of factor VIII concentrates. We reviewed our hospital's experience with 62 boys with FVIII:C levels 0.01-0.3 IU/ml who had a DDAVP challenge test (i.v. 0.3 microg/kg) following diagnosis. A therapeutic response was defined as a 1 h post-FVIII:C increase at least twofold over baseline and > 0.3 IU/ml. Of the total group, 29 (47%) boys responded to DDAVP, all of them with mild haemophilia (baseline FVIII:C > or = 0.05 IU/ml), yielding a response rate of 57% in this subgroup. Boys who responded to DDAVP had higher baseline FVIII:C levels (mean +/- SEM, 0.17 +/- 0.01 vs 0.10 +/- 0.01 IU/ml, P < 0.01) and were older (5.2 +/- 0.8 vs 3 +/- 0.4 years, P = 0.02) than those who failed to do so. The association between DDAVP response and age, however, remains unclear: seven boys who failed the initial challenge test responded to re-challenge after a mean of 6.3 years (median 4.9, range 0.5-12.5), increasing the response rate in boys with mild haemophilia to 71%. Age and FVIII:C association with DDAVP response are both important in boys with mild/moderate haemophilia A. Absence of response to DDAVP should therefore be confirmed by later re-challenge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".