Does the presence of glomalin relate to reduced water infiltration through hydrophobicity?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The resilience and stability of the physical structure of soil impacts directly on all soil processes, mediating microbial activity and defining the flow pathways between the soil ecosystem, waterways and the atmosphere. The effect of the presence of the glycoprotein glomalin exuded from Arbuscular Mycorrhzal (AM) fungi, on soil hydrophobicity is presented. A possible role for glomalin as improving soil structural stability is important in the context of soil protection. Using total glomalin, together with measurements of soil hydrophobicity, we investigate the spatial correlations between the two measurements in the presence and absence of pea roots. Whilst AM fungi were visible within roots (up to 52% root length colonization), no differences in glomalin concentration between planted and unplanted controls were observed. The presence and amount of glomalin did not correspond to the presence or level of hydrophobicity in soil. We discuss these results in relation to AM fungal-glomalin interactions, soil structure and root exudation. Key words: Glomalin, water infiltration, mycorrhizae, soil structure, hydrophobic
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".