MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073510839 · doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(14)78439-1

EPA-1190 - Terrorism or suicide-by-cop

2014· article· en· W2073510839 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elvir Bećirović, Mevludin Hasanović, R. Softić

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Psychiatry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOfficerTerrorismRifleCriminologyPsychologyPolitical scienceLawPsychiatryMedical emergencyMedicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The term suicide by cop is used commonly for police-involved shootings that could be considered suicides because of the subject's precipitated actions that demonstrate suicidal intent through words or behaviors. The notion that victims sometimes initiate physical conflicts in which they are injured or killed is studied for more than 50 years. This is first description of Suicide-by-cop in South-East Europe. Case report On October 28th 2011, MJ, a member of radical islamic movement, attacked the US Embassy in Sarajevo. He spent 50 minutes in plain sight firing from an automatic rifle (AK-47) at the U.S. embassy, seriously wounding a police officer before he was hit by a police sharpshooter. Discussion Police may confront shootings motivated by suicidal subjects more often than reports indicate. Although suicide by cop is most commonly reported and studied in the United States, Canada, and more recently the United Kingdom it appears to be an international phenomenon. Conclusion Mevlid Jasarevic's case was an act of terrorism from the perspective of law. From the perspective of mental health professionals it was also Suicide-by-cop attempt. New information confirm our earlier made conclusion – MJ left movement, shaved beard and changed his outlook. There were some other reasons but terroristic for such attack.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean PsychiatrySame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207