MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Avaliação do paciente em hemodiálise por meio da medida canadense de desempenho ocupacional

2009· article· pt· W2073532956 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Crislaine Andolfato, Milton Carlos Mariotti

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Terapia Ocupacional da Universidade de São Paulo · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Nursing, Elderly Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemodialysisMedicineOccupational therapyPhysical therapyIntervention (counseling)CuritibaChronic renal failureChronic renal insufficiencyInternal medicineNursingRenal functionHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chronic kidney patient under hemodialysis undergoes several changes in his/her daily routine, with the need for strategies able to assist him/her during this process. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the changes occurred in the self-perception of the chronic kidney patients under hemodialysis as regards his/her occupational performance, after the occupational therapy intervention. METHOD: participants were 21 patients with chronic kidney patient under hemodialysis, treated at a Renal Diseases Clinic, located in Curitiba, PR. Subjects were assessed using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure - COPM and reassessed after the intervention period of Occupational Therapy, which was based on the Canadian Occupational Performance Model. RESULTS: the major problems found in the occupational performance of the subjects were to control the solid and liquid diet and to participate in social activities and courses. The percentage of subjects that vary from 2 or more points in scores for satisfaction and performance was 52.4% and 47.6%, respectively. The COPM was able to measure problems in occupational performance of the bearer of chronic kidney patient under hemodialysis and mainly the changes after the intervention of Occupational Therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Terapia Ocupacional da Universidade de São PauloSame topicHealth, Nursing, Elderly CareFrench-language works237,207