MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073534357 · doi:10.1080/07011784.2013.780790

Cisterns and safe drinking water in Canada

2013· article· en· W2073534357 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Julia Baird, Robert Summers, Ryan Plummer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaBrock University
FundersCanadian Water NetworkOhio Department of HealthU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsCisternPotable waterTragedy (event)Water supplySanitationPolitical scienceWater resource managementHumanitiesGeographyEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental scienceArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Access to sources of safe drinking water is imperative to human health and of concern in both developing and developed countries. A myriad of responses have occurred to enhance drinking water safety in Canada over the decade since the Walkerton tragedy. Pressing questions remain about drinking water safety, especially in small systems and private water supplies that fall outside much of the recently implemented regulations. This paper explores the use of cisterns in Canada and their safety as a private means to supply potable drinking water. Knowledge of cistern use in Canada is probed, associated health risks are examined and the ways these risks are being managed are considered. Knowledge of cistern use in Canada at present is nominal. Management and policy considerations need to be advanced alongside further research to better understand and manage risks associated with this source of drinking water. Avoir accès aux sources d’eau potable est nécessaire pour la santé humaine et est une inquiétude importante dans les pays développés et en développement. Une myriade de réponses s’est produite au cours de la décennie depuis la tragédie de Walkerton afin d’améliorer la sécurité de l’eau potable au Canada. Des questions urgentes demeurent quant à la sécurité de l’eau potable, particulièrement dans les petits systèmes et dans les approvisionnements en eau privés qui ne satisfont pas aux plusieurs des règlements récemment mis en place. Cet article examine l’usage des citernes au Canada et leur sécurité en tant que source privée d’eau potable. La connaissance de l’usage des citernes au Canada est sondée, les risques pour la santé associés à ces sources d’eau sont examinés et les façons dont ces risques sont gérés sont explorées. Actuellement, la connaissance de l’usage des citernes au Canada est rudimentaire. La gestion et les considérations de principe ont besoin d’être avancées, accompagné par des recherches plus approfondies afin de mieux comprendre et gérer les risques associés à cette source d’eau potable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2013
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriquesSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207