MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073572483 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.111.626978

Representativeness of the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke Registry

2011· article· en· W2073572483 on OpenAlexaff
Mathew J. Reeves, Gregg C. Fonarow, Eric E. Smith, Wenqin Pan, DaiWai M. Olson, Adrian F. Hernandez, Eric D. Peterson, Lee H. Schwamm

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)CohortRepresentativeness heuristicEmergency medicinePediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke is a large quality improvement-based registry of acute stroke; however, its generalizability is unclear. We used fee-for-service Medicare claims to ascertain the representativeness of ischemic stroke admissions in GWTG-Stroke. METHODS: All 228 815 ischemic stroke admissions aged ≥65 years enrolled in GWTG-Stroke between April 2003 and December 2007 were linked to 926 756 unique fee-for-service Medicare patients with ischemic stroke (primary International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision discharge code 434 or 436) from the same period. Patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between the linked GWTG-Stroke Medicare cohort and the remaining unlinked Medicare cohort. Characteristics of GWTG-Stroke hospitals were compared with non-GWTG-Stroke hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 144 344 of the 228,815 GWTG-Stroke admissions (63.1%) were successfully linked to the 926 756 Medicare ischemic stroke beneficiaries, leaving 782 412 unlinked Medicare patients. Differences in patient characteristics, including age, race, gender, and comorbidities, between the linked and unlinked Medicare cohorts were minimal. Length of stay and rate of discharge home were almost identical between the linked and unlinked groups; however, in-hospital mortality was slightly lower in the linked Medicare cohort (6.3%) compared with the unlinked cohort (7.0%). There were large differences in hospital characteristics between GWTG-Stroke and non-GWTG-Stroke hospitals; GWTG-Stroke hospitals tended to be larger, urban, teaching centers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantial differences between GWTG-Stroke and non-GWTG-Stroke hospitals, Medicare beneficiaries with acute ischemic stroke entered in the GWTG-Stroke program were similar to other Medicare beneficiaries. These data suggest that the Medicare-aged GWTG-Stroke ischemic stroke admissions are generally representative of the national fee-for-service Medicare ischemic stroke population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.330
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations120
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207