Radiofrequency perforation and conventional needle percutaneous transseptal left heart access: Pathological features
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perforating radiofrequency (PRF) energy has been used to obtain percutaneous transseptal left heart access. Contrary to ablative radiofrequency (RF), myocardial tissue responses to PRF thermal injury are incompletely defined. In this study, a newly developed RF catheter system for transseptal left atrial entry was compared with conventional needle puncture. Of 15 piglets having transfemoral cardiac catheterization, 12 had transseptal procedures. Needle punctures (NP) and PRF were followed by acute (1 hr; 3 NP, 3 PRF) and chronic necropsy (1 month; 3 NP, 3 PRF). The remaining three piglets had intentional RF aortic perforation through the atrial roof with necropsy at 1 month. Gross and histopathological effects were examined. Acutely, the gross RF lesion was similar to needle puncture. Histologically, the RF lesions had minimal mural thrombus, an inner zone of thermal injury characterized by grayish cytoplasmic staining (elastic trichrome), and a bubbly transformation of the cytoplasm in innermost cardiomyocytes, partial persistence of cross-striations, and an acute inflammatory reaction. The outer extent of the lesion (< 1 mm) was defined by a halo of contraction band necrosis similar to needle puncture. Acute NP injury showed comparable depth and extent of myocyte necrosis (principally contraction bands) with adjacent tissue hemorrhage and edema. At 1 month, a well-developed densely collagenous scar was present in both aortic and transseptal PRF lesions. The extent of acute RF injury is similar to that seen in conventional NP, but the characteristics of tissue insult are different. Both show well-developed healing at 1 month.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".