MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073666129 · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3181574272

Exaggerated Differences in Pulse Wave Velocity Between Left and Right Sides Among Patients With Anxiety Disorders and Cardiovascular Disease

2007· article· en· W2073666129 on OpenAlexaff
Vikram K. Yeragani, Rahul Kumar, K. J. Bär, Pratap Chokka, Manuel E. Tancer

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychosomatic Medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulse wave velocityMedicineCardiologyArterial stiffnessInternal medicineAnxietyBlood pressureRight Common Carotid ArteryCommon carotid arteryCarotid arteriesPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To compare the left-right differences in pulse wave velocity (PWV) measures in normal controls and patients with anxiety disorders and cardiac disease. Pulses from the right and left sides of normal subjects are highly correlated at each segmental level. However, some evidence suggests that the right hemisphere has a greater effect on parasympathetic activity, as there may be a right hemisphere disadvantage in patients with low cardiac vagal function. Decreased vagal function is associated with vascular dysfunction and hypertension. Methods: We compared normal controls (n = 22), patients with anxiety (n = 26), and patients with cardiovascular disease (n = 72) using the Vascular Profiler (VP-1000), which enables the measurement of ankle and brachial blood pressure (BP) in both arms (brachial), both legs (ankle) and carotid artery, and lead I electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram. Using these signals, PWV, and arterial stiffness index % were calculated for the comparison of these measures on the right and left sides of the body. Results: Patients with anxiety and cardiovascular disease had significantly higher left-right differences in heart-ankle pulse wave velocity, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, and arterial stiffness index percentage compared with that of normal controls. Our data also showed significant differences between left-right vascular indices in patients with anxiety and cardiovascular disease (p < .00001); there was no such significant difference in normal controls. Conclusions: These results may implicate an exaggerated vagal withdrawal in the left extremities resulting in higher PWV in patients with anxiety and cardiovascular illness. HR = heart rate; BP = blood pressure; PWV = pulse wave velocity; HF = high frequency (0.15–0.5 Hz); PTT = pulse transit time; HA = heart-ankle; BA = brachial-ankle; ECG = electrocardiogram; PCG = phonocardiogram; VP = vascular profiler; BMDP = biomedical data package; ANOVA = analysis of variance; MAP = mean arterial pressure; PEP = pre-ejection period; GAD = generalized anxiety disorder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychosomatic MedicineSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207