Influence of lithospheric thickness variations on 3‐D crustal velocities due to glacial isostatic adjustment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Predictions of 3‐D crustal velocities driven by glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) have generally been based on spherically symmetric Earth models. We adopt a finite‐volume formulation to explore the impact of lateral variations in elastic plate strength, including lithospheric thickness changes across the continent‐ocean interface and plate boundary weak zones, on these predictions. Weak zones introduce horizontal rate perturbations with a plate scale coherency and amplitudes reaching 1–2 mm/yr; radial velocity perturbations can be as large, but are geographically isolated to the weak zones (specifically, the North Atlantic Ridge). A discontinuity in ocean‐continent lithospheric thickness significantly impacts rates along continental margins (order 1 mm/yr for radial rates and generally about half this for tangential rates). We conclude that lateral variations in lithospheric strength should be included in future GIA analyzes of space‐geodetic survey results and in assessing the impact of GIA on the stability of geodetic reference frames.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".