Water price elasticity and public acceptability on conservation options in the city of Volos, Greece
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efforts to satisfy increasing demand have often been concentrated principally on constructing new water systems, thus increasing the supply of water.The relationship between water abstraction and water availability has turned into a major stress factor in the exploitation of water resources.There is a wide recognition nowadays that there is a need for strategies for the sustainable use of water resources and water demand management.In the city of Volos, Greece, the number of water meters has been tripled from 1979 to 2006 while yearly water production has increased 2.62 times these 27 years.The fact that water sources have remained stable has created a disruption of water balance.In order to explore new approaches toward sustainable water management in the water supply sector, evaluate various aspects of current water policy, investigate the perspectives of water saving and evaluate water price elasticity in the city of Volos, Greece, a survey concerning the residential sector has been performed recently.All qualitative data were gathered through questionnaire with the method of personal interview.The questionnaire examines social features of consumers, water use patterns, water conservation methods, water pricing issues and the level of water services.Water quality, water demand and water availability issues, waterrelated problems, as well as public information concerning water and environmental issues, public reactions to price changes and public willingness to pay in the residential sector are the main aspects examined and analyzed.The influence of some selected variables in water conservation, such as the price of water, the size of the dwelling, the indoor and outdoor uses, the educational level, the income of consumers as well as rainfall and temperature levels, is examined, hierarchically set and residential water demand curve is calculated using the fixed effects and random effects model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".