Facile preparation and characterization of sodium alginate/graphite conductive composite hydrogel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conductive composite hydrogels based on sodium alginate (SA) and graphite were fabricated by a facile method via dispersing homogeneously conductive graphite into SA hydrogel matrix. The hydrogel was formed by in situ release of Ca 2+ from Ca–EDTA, thus eliminating the multistep reactions and tedious purification compared to the previous work. Raman spectra, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X‐ray diffraction (XRD), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were used to characterize the structure, crystalline nature, and thermostability of SA/graphite composite hydrogels. The SA/graphite composite hydrogels exhibited the improved network and layer‐type structure. The thermal stability of the hydrogel decreased slightly after the graphite was incorporated into the SA hydrogel matrix regardless of the content of graphite. The enhanced mechanical strength of SA/graphite composite hydrogel was achieved via increasing the f value (i.e., [Ca 2+ ]/[COO ‐ in alginate]) and lowering graphite content. The conductivity of the composite hydrogels could be varied in a broad range, reaching up to 10 −3 S/cm, mainly depending on the content of graphite and the f value. POLYM. COMPOS., 37:3050–3056, 2016. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".