Les relations avec les pairs à l’adolescence comme facteurs de risque de l’insatisfaction à l’égard de l’image corporelle.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette etude vise a examiner dans quelle mesure certains facteurs de risque sur le plan des relations avec les pairs (incitations a maigrir et critiques negatives au sujet de l'apparence physique, victimisation par les pairs, niveau d'insatisfaction a l'egard de l'image corporelle des amis de meme sexe et frequence des conversations entre amis concernant l'apparence physique) permettent de rendre compte des changements observes dans l'insatisfaction a l'egard de l'image corporelle (IIC) au debut de l'adolescence. Des informations sur l'IIC ont ete recueillies deux annees consecutives aupres de 594 eleves du secondaire I et II. Les resultats montrent que certaines caracteristiques individuelles des eleves au Temps 1, telles que le sexe, l'indice de masse corporelle et l'estime de soi generale, sont associees a l'augmentation de l'IIC sur une periode de un an. Une fois les facteurs de risque individuels controles, la contribution des facteurs de risque relationnels s'avere non significative. Les differents facteurs de risque relationnels sont toutefois etroitement associes aux caracteristiques individuelles des eleves au debut de l'adolescence. Le patron de resultats est similaire pour les filles et les garcons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".