PARALLEL HYBRID METAHEURISTIC ON SHARED MEMORY SYSTEM FOR REAL-TIME UAV PATH PLANNING
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present a parallel hybrid metaheuristic that combines the strengths of the particle swarm optimization (PSO) and the genetic algorithm (GA) to produce an improved path-planner algorithm for fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The proposed solution uses a multi-objective cost function we developed and generates in real-time feasible and quasi-optimal trajectories in complex 3D environments. Our parallel hybrid algorithm simulates multiple GA populations and PSO swarms in parallel while allowing migration of solutions. This collaboration between the GA and the PSO leads to an algorithm that exhibits the strengths of both optimization methods and produces superior solutions. Moreover, by using the "single-program, multiple-data" parallel programming paradigm, we maximize the use of today's multicore CPU and significantly reduce the execution time of the parallel program compared to a sequential implementation. We observed a quasi-linear speedup of 10.7 times faster on a 12-core shared memory system resulting in an execution time of 5 s which allows in-flight planning. Finally, we show with statistical significance that our parallel hybrid algorithm produces superior trajectories to the parallel GA or the parallel PSO we previously developed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it