Doppler imaging of stellar surface structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We reconstruct a time series of 28 surface temperature maps (Doppler-images) of the spotted single K2-dwarf LQ Hya from 35 consecutive stellar rotations in Nov.–Dec. 1996. Two more maps are obtained from data in late April and early May 2000. All maps show spot activity preferably at low latitudes between -20° and +50°, with a concentration in a band centered at around +30°, and with only occasional evidence for a higher-latitude spot extension. No trace of a polar spot is found at any of the above epochs. Most of this morphology can be reproduced by our flux-tube emergence model, except for the equatorial activity where the strong Coriolis force due to the rapid rotation always deflects flux tubes to higher latitudes. We also present the detection of weak differential surface rotation from a number of cross-correlation maps of the time-series images in late 1996. A solar-type differential rotation law, i.e. the equator rotating faster than the poles, with rad/day (lap time of ≈280 days) is in agreement with the data. Using the available photoelectric observations from 21 years we refine the rotation period to days and find a remarkable phase coherence over the course of 21 years, supporting the recent finding of active longitudes by Berdyugina et al. Furthermore, our photometry shows a complex multi-cyclic long-term brightness variability with three periods of years, its harmonic and years, respectively. The 3.7-year period would be in good agreement with the fundamental-mode oscillation period predicted by Kitchatinov et al. from a distributed-dynamo model, but remains to be confirmed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".