Age of the Ballachulish and Glencoe Igneous Complexes (Scottish Highlands), and paragenesis of zircon, monazite and baddeleyite in the Ballachulish Aureole
Bibliographic record
Abstract
U–Pb zircon ages are presented for the Ballachulish Igneous Complex ( 207 Pb– 206 Pb age 427 ± 1 Ma; 206 Pb– 238 U age 423 ± 0.3 Ma) and Glencoe Volcanic Complex ( 207 Pb– 206 Pb age 406 ± 6 Ma) of the Scottish Highlands. These ages are significantly more precise than pre-existing age constraints, and discriminate a previously unresolved age difference of c . 20 Ma between the two complexes. This difference in age provides an explanation for the c . 10 km difference in crustal level between the two magmatic events, and constrains exhumation rates for the Argyll region to be on average c . 0.4 km Ma −1 over the period c . 425–405 Ma. With improved age constraints on the Ballachulish Igneous Complex in place, the associated metamorphic aureole is used as a type locality to investigate the metamorphic behaviour of the U-bearing accessory minerals baddeleyite, zircon and monazite. Baddeleyite formed in impure dolomites by the reaction of detrital zircon with dolomite and gives the same U–Pb age as the intrusive complex, consistent with its contact metamorphic origin. Detrital zircon appears to be inert throughout much of the metamorphic aureole, with contact metamorphic zircon growth being restricted to migmatite-grade rocks. A possible exception is the development of enigmatic, very narrow overgrowths at temperatures between c . 500 and 600 °C. Monazite exhibits a variety of textures in lower-grade parts of the aureole (<550 °C), but occurs as distinctive clusters and trails of tiny ovoid grains at temperatures above about 560–600 °C. Monazite thus appears sensitive to metamorphism at lower temperatures than zircon and may therefore be a better target for metamorphic age measurements in rocks that reach mid-amphibolite facies but do not experience partial melting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".