MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Toward Spinal Cord Injury Repair Strategies: Peptide Surface Modification of Expanded Poly(Tetrafluoroethylene) Fibers for Guided Neurite Outgrowth In Vitro

2003· article· en· W2074020057 on OpenAlexaff
Derek Shaw, Molly S. Shoichet

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Craniofacial Surgery · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuritePeptideTetrafluoroethyleneBiophysicsLamininIn vitroFiberMaterials scienceExtracellular matrixPolymerBiochemistryChemistryComposite materialBiologyCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Expanded poly(tetrafluoroethylene) fibers were surface modified using an ultraviolet-activated mercury/ammonia reaction to yield amine-functional groups for the coupling of laminin-derived cell adhesive peptides CYIGSR, CDPGYIGSR, CIKVAV, and CQAASIKVAV. Surface elemental composition, determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and radiolabeling data indicated that the amount of peptide introduced was approximately equivalent regardless of peptide type, yet mixed peptide surfaces had approximately 60% YIGSR and 40% IKVAV. The peptide-modified surfaces were compared in terms of the response of dorsal root ganglia with neurite length and number of cells attached to each fiber measured. All peptide-functionalized surfaces had a greater cellular response than the aminated ePTFE and ePTFE controls. Surfaces modified with extended peptide sequences CDPGYIGSR and CQAASIKVAV demonstrated a greater cellular response than those modified with the shorter peptide sequences CYIGSR and CIKVAV, respectively, likely because the extended peptides more closely mimic the three-dimensional conformation that the peptides maintain in laminin. Differences in neurite extension were evident among the peptide-functionalized surfaces, with the longest neurites observed on surfaces modified with both CQAASIKVAV and CDPGYIGSR. The "guidance capacity" of the fibers as a function of fiber diameter was investigated in terms of length and directionality of neurite outgrowth. As fiber diameter decreased (from 100+ to 10 microm), the neurites tended to grow to a greater degree down the length of the fiber. The thinnest fibers (with diameters <20 microm) extended shorter neurites than the fibers with a wider diameter. Combining neurite length with guidance indicated that of the fiber diameters investigated, the optimal fiber diameter for neurite guidance was between 30 and 50 microm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Craniofacial SurgerySame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207