MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sensorimotor organization in patients who have undergone hemispherectomy

2000· article· en· W2074074953 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Bernasconi, Neda Bernasconi, Maryse Lassonde, Paule-Johanne Toussaint, Ernst Meyer, David C. Reutens, Jean Gotman, Frédérick Andermann, Jean‐Guy Villemure

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemispherectomyHemiparesisSensory systemStimulationPsychologyNeuroscienceSensory stimulation therapySomatosensory systemCerebral hemisphereMedicineAnatomyEpilepsyLesion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To identify cortical structures that subserve residual motor and sensory function in patients with congenital hemiparesis due to a porencephalic cyst, we examined, using [(15)O]H2O, PET and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in three patients with left-sided hemiparesis who had undergone hemispherectomy. Motor stimulation of the affected hand produced ipsilateral activation in the premotor area in all patients, the SMA in two patients, and SII in two patients. Vibrotactile stimulation resulted in activation of the ipsilateral SII in all subjects. Median nerve stimulation of the affected hand produced ipsilateral long-latency SEPs in fronto-centro-parietal areas, whereas stimulation of the non-affected hand produced normal early cortical potentials in the contralateral hemisphere. Our results suggest that residual function in the paretic hand is warranted through non-primary motor and sensory areas, and higher order associative areas in the intact hemisphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroreportSame topicNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismFrench-language works237,207