Adult Sickle Cell Disease Epidemiology and the Potential Role of a Multidisciplinary Comprehensive Care Center in a City with Low Prevalence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics of the sickle cell disease population in a city of low prevalence and compare them to those reported in the literature. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of all sickle cell disease patients seen in the Calgary Health Region, Calgary, Alberta, Canada from 2006 to 2010. Data on clinical endpoints including emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, transfusions, as well as laboratory parameters were collected. A total of 37 adult sickle cell disease patients were identified. Over 5 years, they were represented by a total of 49.2 ED presentations/year, 29.2 (59.0%) of these requiring admission. Eighty-three percent of these presentations were for acute pain episodes. We concluded that the number of ED visits, hospital admissions and several other parameters in our cohort were similar to those in other centers of higher prevalence. This suggests that guidelines representing regions of high prevalence may be applicable to smaller centers, where patients experience similar clinical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".