MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074169496 · doi:10.2118/107923-ms

New Attempt in Improving Sweep Efficiency at the Mature Koluel Kaike and Piedra Clavada Waterflooding Projects of the S. Jorge Basin in Argentina

2007· article· en· W2074169496 on OpenAlexaff
Pablo Adrian Paez Yañez, J. L. Mustoni, Maximo F. Relling, K. T. Chang, Paul Hopkinson, Harry Frampton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsNalcor Energy (Canada)Nalco (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringStructural basinEnvironmental scienceGeologyInjectorParticle (ecology)Computer scienceEngineeringGeomorphologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proposal Most of the mature waterflood projects at the San Jorge Basin have been affected by two main problems, poor displacement and sweep efficiencies, both have limited the recovery factor achievable. This paper presents a field trial of a new reactive particulate system in an attempt to improve this volumetric sweep efficiency. This particulate system is being used to treat selected injectors operated by Pan American Energy in the Koluel Kaike and Piedra Clavada fields, located in the southern part of Argentina. The main purpose of this field trial is to demonstrate the ability of the new system to improve oil recovery by diversion of injected water into the poorly swept zones around the thief zone or streaks. This state-of-the-art technology is able to propagate deep into thief zones and has a novel mechanism of action to overcome the observed limitations in conventional polymer flooding and gel processes. The particles are manufactured having properties which allow it to propagate through porous media with the injection water. Once in the reservoir and under the influence of heat the particle expands to a size that can block pore throats, so water injected after treatment is diverted into less efficiently swept zones. The paper will describe in detail the mechanism and selection criteria of reservoirs and wells to apply the mentioned IOR technology. Theoretical and practical issues involved at the design of the application, as well as operational and logistics aspects will be also included. Finally, it will include the updated information available from the ongoing pilot tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207