Bibliographic record
Abstract
El texto pretende mencionar algunas direcciones suscitadas por la experiencia de viaje en la obra de Cynthia Rismky, particularmente en su primer libro Poste Restante. La propuesta más allá de apelar a una continuidad de la literatura de viaje, de la anécdota y el detalle etnográfico; conduce a pensar una geopoética del viaje sostenida en una experiencia elaborada, es decir, en la intensión de reconstruir aquellos recorridos y vínculos espontáneos de la memoria, bajo el procedimiento colaborativo de la palabra y la imagen. * * * This article intends to point out some directions from the experience of travel in the works of Cynthia Rismky, in particular from her first bookPoste Restante. Rather than proposing a continuity of travel literature, narrative and ethnographic details, the text invites to a rethinking of a geo-poetics of travel based on an ellaborated experience, that is, in the intentionality to reconstruct spaces covered and spontaneous links of memory under the procedure of a collaboration between word and image.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".