Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper seeks to bring together two papers that I worked on during the early 1990s. My focus was on both opening up for debate the concept of globalization, applying it to sport and using an Eliasian approach. In addition, i sought to draw together issues of national identity, gender and globalization – as issue which was, and, to a degree, remains unexplored. Specific examples of British/English sport and wider political concerns were used to highlight the broader theoretical issues involved. Several of these concerns remain topical. Notes 1 This article is a synthesis of two papers given at the 1993 NASSS conference at Ottawa and a version was published in 1994 as 'Sport, Identity Politics and Globalization: Diminishing Contrasts and Increasing Varieties'. Sociology of Sport Journal 11(4): 398–427. 2 CitationWolfe, 'The Global and the Specific'. 3 CitationElias and Scotson, The Established and the Outsiders. 4 CitationMennell, 'The Globalization of Human Society'. 5 CitationAppadurai, 'Disjuncture and Difference'. 6 CitationArnason, 'Nationalism', 224. 7 CitationElias, The Civilizing Process. 8 CitationElias, The Civilizing Process, 255. 9 CitationElias, The Civilizing Process, 256. 10 CitationConnerton, How Societies Remember. 11 CitationElias, What is Sociology?, 14–15; CitationMennell, 'The Formation of We-Images'. 12 CitationGitlin, 'The Rise of Identity Politics'. 13 Elias, What is Sociology?, 128. 14 Mennell, 'The Formation of We-Images', 178. 15 Maguire, 'Globalization'. 16 CitationSmith, National Identity, 77. 17 CitationHargreaves, Sporting Females, 68. 18 Wolfe, 'The Global and the Specific', 169. 19 Maguire, 'Globalization'. 20 CitationMassey, Space, Place and Gender. 21 CitationRose, Feminism and Geography. 22 Guardian February 2, 1993, 18. 23 The Independent February 8 1993, 21. 24 The Observer February 7, 1993, 63. 25 CitationSaid, Culture and Imperialism, 166. 26 Birley, The Willow Wand, 71. 27 CitationCook, cited in Birley, Citation1979, 72. 28 CitationCook, cited in Birley, Citation1979, 72 29 CitationMaguire, 'Globalization'. 30 CitationTurner, A note on Nostalgia, 149. 31 CitationTurner, Theories of Modernity and Postmodernity, 149 32 The Guardian April 23, 1993, 1. 33 The Independent on Sunday April 25, 1993, 24. 34 CitationRobertson, 'After Nostalgia,; 'Globalization, 27. 35 The Guardian July 28, 1993, 2. 36 The Guardian February 26, 1993, 20. 37 The Independent February 26 1993, 19. 38 Daily Telegraph February 23, 1993, 16. 39 Daily Mirror March 18, 1993, 46–7. 40 The Independent March 12, 1993, 24. 41 The Independent March 23, 1993, 21. 42 The Independent March 23 1993, 21. 43 The Observer March 28, 1993, 23. 44 Daily Mirror June 3, 1993, 1; Daily Star June 3, 1993, 1. 45 The Independent June 12, 1993, 16 46 Daily Telegraph August 23, 1993, 34. 47 The Sun June 11, 1993, 40. 48 Daily Telegraph June 11, 1993, 22. 49 The Guardian June 23, 1993, 15. 50 The Observer June 27, 1993, 41. 51 The Guardian June 11, 1992, 20. 52 Daily Mail June 12, 1993, 9. 53 The Times August 12, 1993, 16. 54 The Times March 31, 1994, 1. 55 The Times April 8, 1994, 17. 56 The Observer January16, 1994, 22. 57 The Times January 18, 1994, 19. 58 The Independent January 11, 1994, 9 59 CitationMaguire, 'Globalization'; 'Preliminary Observations'. 60 The Independent April 12, 1994, 15. 61 Frankfurter Allegemeine Zeitung June 3, 1994, 8.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it