MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074295152 · doi:10.1353/lan.2007.0051

<b>Papers of the thirty-fourth Algonquian Conference</b> . Ed. by H. C. Wolfart. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Linguistics Department, 2003. Pp. 399. ISSN 00315671.

2007· article· en· W2074295152 on OpenAlex
Thomas R. Wier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic Variation and Morphology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryListing (finance)George (robot)AnthropologyLinguisticsClassicsSociologyArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Papers of the thirty-fourth Algonquian Conference ed. by H. C. Wolfart Thomas R. Wier Papers of the thirty-fourth Algonquian Conference. Ed. by H. C. Wolfart. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Linguistics Department, 2003. Pp. 399. ISSN 00315671. The Algonquian Conference is an international conference held every year alternating between the [End Page 234] United States and Canada. The conference brings together scholars whose work touches on Algonquian tribal cultures and languages. This volume contains papers from twenty-two of the more than sixty presentations made at the 2002 meeting, with an index listing the presentations made but not included here. In terms of content, the book is about equally divided between more anthropologically and more linguistically oriented papers, with a strong descriptive flavor to the latter. It also has a relatively broad approach, including the following languages and/or dialects discussed at some length: Algonquin-Ojibwe, Chimariko (Hokan), all varieties of Cree, Karuk (Hokan), Kickapoo, Mascouten, Menominee, Meskwaki (or Fox), Mi’kmaq, Montagnais, Naskapi, Sauk, and Yurok (related to Algonquian languages through Algic). In general, this volume should prove useful to a wide range of scholars, whether from formalist, typological, or functionalist perspectives, as all such views are represented. After the introductory material, the following contributors and works are included: George F. Aubin, ‘The Algonquin-French manuscript ASSM 104 (1661): Miscellanea’; Lisa Conathan and Esther Wood, ‘Repetitive reduplication in Yurok and Karuk: Semantic effects of contact’; Clare Cook, ‘A semantic classification of Menominee preverbs’; Alan Corbiere, ‘Exploring historical literacy in Manitoulin Island Ojibwe’; Amy Dahlstrom, ‘Owls and cannibals revisited: Traces of Windigo features in Meskwaki texts’; Regna Darnell, ‘Algonquian perspectives on social cohesion in Canadian society’; James L. Fidelholtz, ‘Contraction in Mi’kmaq verbs and its orthographical implications’; Inge Genee, ‘An Indo-Europeanist on the prairies: C. C. Uhlenbeck’s work on Algonquian and Indo-European’; Ives Goddard, ‘Heckewelder’s 1792 vocabulary from Ohio: A possible attestation of Mascouten’; Stephanie Inglis, ‘The deferential evidential in Mi’kmaq’; Marie-Odile Junker, ‘Demonstratives in East Cree’; Monica Macaulay, ‘Negation, dubitatives and mirativity in Menominee’; Allan K. McDougall and Lisa Philips Valentine, ‘Treaty 29: Why Moore became less’; Cath Oberholtzer, ‘The Dorothy Grant collections: Granting an insight into Cree material culture’; David H. Pentland, ‘The Missinipi dialect of Cree’; Simone Poliandri, ‘Mi’kmaq people and tradition: Indian brook lobster fishing in St. Mary’s Bay, Nova Scotia’; Richard J. Preston, ‘Crees and Algonquins at “The Front”: More on twentieth-century transformations’; Christine Schreyer, ‘Travel routes of the Chapleau Cree: An ethnohistorical study’; Nicholas N. Smith, ‘Creating new relations to improve relations: Strangers as Wabanaki chiefs’; Bonnie Swierzbin, ‘Stress in border lakes Ojibwe’; Lisa Philips Valentine and Allan K. McDougall, ‘The discourse of British and US treaties in the Old Northwest, 1790–1843’; Willard Walker, ‘George Soctomah’s hat’. Thomas R. Wier University of Chicago Copyright © 2007 Linguistic Society of America

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it