Generating rights for communities harmed by mining: legal and other action
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract As global mineral prices and production have boomed, Canadian mining companies have expanded their operations abroad with the support of the federal government. In light of the unregulated character and often destructive impacts of much new mining activity, the recent extractive industry expansion has been accompanied by increasing conflict. We analyse lawsuits launched in Canadian courts and in the inter-American human rights system by affected communities in Latin America. We conclude that both new legislation (such as Bill C-300) and continued effective collaboration between local civil society and Canadian NGOs are required for peaceful resolution of conflicts. Résumé Avec une forte croissance de la production et des prix des produits miniers, les entreprises minières canadiennes ont élargi leurs opérations à l'étranger avec le soutien du gouvernement fédéral. Dans un contexte de vide règlementaire et des conséquences destructives de cette industrie, le développement du secteur a été accompagné de plus en plus de conflits. Nous analysons les poursuites judiciaires lancées au Canada et dans le système des droits humains Interaméricain contre les entreprises minières canadiennes. Nous concluons que de nouvelle législation (comme la loi C-300) et une collaboration continue et efficace entre la société civile et les organisations non gouvernementales canadiennes sont nécessaires pour la résolution pacifique des conflits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it