MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074310740 · doi:10.1121/1.4778764

Nonstationary bifurcations with additive noise

2002· article· en· W2074310740 on OpenAlexaff
Huw G. Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
Topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBifurcationCascadePeriod-doubling bifurcationMathematicsNoise (video)Transcritical bifurcationNonlinear systemBifurcation diagramControl theory (sociology)Mathematical analysisStatistical physicsPhysicsComputer scienceControl (management)Quantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The response of nonlinear systems with slow variation of a parameter through a bifurcation may be critically affected by very-low-level noise. Examples to be discussed include passage through resonance of a periodically pumped laser, a transcritical bifurcation associated with a coupled pitch/roll model of ship motion, and a period-doubling cascade of a discrete map. In each case the original form of the response persists as the control parameter varies through the bifurcation, even though this original form is now unstable. Noise is required to trigger the bifurcated form; then there is a rapid transition with exponential growth from one form of response to another. Sinusoidal parameter variation through the bifurcation at sufficiently high frequency may effectively stabilize the original form by preventing an appreciable growth of the bifurcated form; noise is destabilizing. The two competing effects are analyzed using matched-asymptotic-expansions. The innermost of a nested set of three expansions describes how noise causes the growth of the bifurcating form from the original unstable form. Previous results for period-doubling [H. G. Davies and K. Rangavajhula, Proc R. Soc. London, Ser. A 457, 2965–2982 (2001)] are modified for the other types of bifurcation, and are extended to a higher order period-doubling cascade using renormalization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcationFrench-language works237,207