MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074317550 · doi:10.1088/0960-1317/20/6/065012

Void nucleation at a sequentially plasma-activated silicon/silicon bonded interface

2010· article· en· W2074317550 on OpenAlexafffund
M.M.R. Howlader, F Zhang, Md Golam Kibria

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Micromechanics and Microengineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D IC and TSV technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsNucleationMaterials scienceVoid (composites)SiliconReactive-ion etchingWaferScanning electron microscopePlasma etchingAnnealing (glass)Transmission electron microscopyComposite materialPlasmaPlasma activationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Etching (microfabrication)ChemistryNanotechnologyMetallurgyLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two 4 inch silicon wafers were directly bonded using a sequentially plasma-activated bonding method (i.e. O 2 reactive ion etching (RIE) plasma followed by N 2 microwave (MW) radicals) at room temperature. The bonded wafers were annealed from 200 to 900 °C in order to explore the nucleation of voids at the interface. The plasma-induced void nucleation was dominated by O 2 RIE power over O 2 RIE activation time. The thermal-induced void nucleation occurred preferentially at the plasma-induced defect sites. The nucleation of void density was quantitatively determined and explained using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy observations. The electron energy loss spectroscopy results revealed the existence of silicon oxide at the bonded interface. The reduction in bonding strength after annealing at high temperature is correlated to the increase in void density. The contact angle and surface roughness of the sequentially plasma-treated surfaces have been observed to explain the nucleation of voids and the reduction of bonding strength. The plasma-induced defect sites such as nanopores and craters have been identified using an atomic force microscope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Micromechanics and MicroengineeringSame topic3D IC and TSV technologiesFrench-language works237,207